Expediente Penal N° 25395-2012 Robo Agravado

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisor On October 20, 2012, staff of the Santa Elizabeth-Lima police station, at the request of Edson Joel Ñañez Pérez (18) intervened with Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio (29), who in the company of another guy snatched his cell phone. The wrongful act happened in circumstances that the aggrieved was in the interior of a store, two blocks from his home, where he was intercepted by the accused, who caught him in the back, and with a broken bottle threatened him and in the company of another guy took it out of the store and then drive him to his home of the imputed, once inside he was stripped of his cell phone. The accused, in the presence of the representative of the Public Ministry accepted to have participated in the fact criminal. During the personal registration of the accused, by intervening police personnel, no belonging to the aggrieved officer was found. Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio was convicted as the perpetrator of the crime against the estate – aggravated robbery and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment of effective liberty and fixed the sum of ten thousand Suns for civil reparation in favor of the aggrieved. This sentence was a matter of recourse to annulment brought by the sentenced, the same one that was granted. The Public Ministry filed an appeal for annulment, however, by failing to present the basics of law was declared inadmissible. Elevated the dossier to the Transitional Penal Chamber of the Supreme Court, it was referred to the first Supreme Prosecutor's office in the Penal state, which, by opinion, expressed no nullity in the contested sentence. Returned the file to the Transitional Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, on 9 July 2015, declared nullity in the contested sentence, and by reforming it, it acquitted Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio of the fiscal accusation.
dc.contributor.author Janampa, Marleni Montes
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-29T17:47:33Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-29T17:47:33Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.ulasamericas.edu.pe/handle/upa/636
dc.description.abstract El 20 de octubre de 2012, personal de la comisaría Santa Elizabeth - Lima, a solicitud de Edson Joel Ñañez Pérez (18) intervino a Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio (29), quien en compañía de otro sujeto le arrebató su teléfono celular. El hecho ilícito sucedió en circunstancias que el agraviado se encontraba en el interior de una tienda, a dos cuadras de su domicilio, donde fue interceptado por el imputado, quien lo cogió por la espalda, y con una botella rota lo amenazó y en compañía de otro sujeto lo sacaron de la tienda para luego conducirlo a su vivienda del imputado, una vez en el interior lo despojaron de su celular. El imputado, en presencia de la representante del ministerio público aceptó haber participado en el hecho delictuoso. Durante el registro personal que se le efectuó al imputado, por parte del personal policial interviniente, no se le halló ninguna pertenencia del agraviado. Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio fue condenando a como autor del delito contra el patrimonio – robo agravado y le impuso a doce años de pena privativa de libertad efectiva y fijó la suma de diez mil soles por concepto de reparación civil a favor del agraviado. Dicha sentencia fue materia de recurso de nulidad interpuesto por el sentenciado, el mismo que fue concedido. El Ministerio Público interpuso recurso de nulidad, sin embargo, al no cumplir con presentar los fundamentos de ley fue declarado improcedente. Elevado el expediente a la Sala Penal Transitoria de la Corte Suprema, fue remitido a la Primera Fiscalía Suprema en lo Penal que mediante dictamen, opinó no haber nulidad en la sentencia impugnada. Devuelto el expediente a la Sala Penal Transitoria de la Corte Suprema, el 9 de julio de 2015, declaró haber nulidad en la sentencia impugnada, y reformándola absolvió a Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio de la acusación fiscal es_PE
dc.description.abstract On October 20, 2012, staff of the Santa Elizabeth-Lima police station, at the request of Edson Joel Ñañez Pérez (18) intervened with Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio (29), who in the company of another guy snatched his cell phone. The wrongful act happened in circumstances that the aggrieved was in the interior of a store, two blocks from his home, where he was intercepted by the accused, who caught him in the back, and with a broken bottle threatened him and in the company of another guy took it out of the store and then drive him to his home of the imputed, once inside he was stripped of his cell phone. The accused, in the presence of the representative of the Public Ministry accepted to have participated in the fact criminal. During the personal registration of the accused, by intervening police personnel, no belonging to the aggrieved officer was found. Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio was convicted as the perpetrator of the crime against the estate – aggravated robbery and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment of effective liberty and fixed the sum of ten thousand Suns for civil reparation in favor of the aggrieved. This sentence was a matter of recourse to annulment brought by the sentenced, the same one that was granted. The Public Ministry filed an appeal for annulment, however, by failing to present the basics of law was declared inadmissible. Elevated the dossier to the Transitional Penal Chamber of the Supreme Court, it was referred to the first Supreme Prosecutor's office in the Penal state, which, by opinion, expressed no nullity in the contested sentence. Returned the file to the Transitional Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, on 9 July 2015, declared nullity in the contested sentence, and by reforming it, it acquitted Víctor Alberto Cotaquispe Valerio of the fiscal accusation.
dc.description.uri Trabajo de investigación es_PE
dc.format application/pdf es_PE
dc.language.iso spa es_PE
dc.publisher Universidad Peruana de las Américas es_PE
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es_PE
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pe/ es_PE
dc.source Universidad Peruana de las Américas es_PE
dc.source Repositorio Institucional – UPA es_PE
dc.subject Corte Suprema es_PE
dc.subject Sala Penal es_PE
dc.title Expediente Penal N° 25395-2012 Robo Agravado es_PE
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis es_PE
thesis.degree.name Abogado es_PE
thesis.degree.level Título Profesional es_PE
thesis.degree.discipline Derecho es_PE
thesis.degree.grantor Universidad Peruana de las Américas. Facultad de Derecho es_PE


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess